![]() | You are viewing Log in Create a LiveJournal Account Learn more | Explore LJ: Life Entertainment Music Culture News & Politics Technology |
Last week I was off on glorious vacation. Ok, so it was really only up to my cottage, but whatever. I still had a week off work, a week to wake up as late as I want, and a week to do absolutely nothing but watch seasons 1 and 2 of Criminal Minds on DVD and re-read the Twilight saga to get prepared for the newest, Breaking Dawn. Which I did get at midnight, but only because I knew I could and I knew I'd be up that late anyway. Don't get me wrong, I really like this series, but the way in which it's compared to Harry Potter kind of bugs me. IMO, this is NOTHING like the wonderful world of HP (though I might be a bit biased because those are my favorite books). As much as I love Twilight, it really doesn't have much on Harry Potter.
I got to watch seasons 1 and 2 of CM, which is definitely my favorite show. I hadn't re-watched season 1 in awhile, so it was nice to see how the team has changed and grown. Especially Reid (who is my favie!). He used to be an awkward, socially challenged kid, but he's evolved into a more confident man. Granted, he still spouts off random facts all the time, but that's what makes him so loveable. Seriously, I've got it bad for this character. It truly sucks that he's fictional. The best ones are, aren't they? :)
So one of my co-workers decided to listen to Family Life Radio today (yes the one who wanted to listen to country on Monday). Which is fine. Not exactly my cup of tea, but whatev. I can deal with it. But then this ad came on. It was about abortion and same-sex marriage. Various laws dealing with the two issues were mentioned, specifically how an abortion ban had been overturned, as well as a ban on same-sex marriage. Then it made sure to point out that you need to vote to ensure that your values are upheld. Now, I get that FLR is more than likely conservative (especially about these topics), while I am most definitely not. But at the same time, it seems to me that the ad is implying that those who agree with same-sex marriage and are pro-choice (like myself) don't have the best values. Excuse me, but just because I don't believe in your old, traditionalist, stuck-in-the-mud way of thinking does not mean that I'm wrong. Maybe it's just me, but I thought that ad was a little condemning, which I don't believe they have any right to do. Make your point, but do it without implying that I have no values. That I do take offense to.
I sincerely dislike having this debate with people who have different beliefs than me. Normally, I'm all for a good debate--I love to argue. But most of the people who are anti-gay marriage and pro-life are SO stuck in their beliefs, and aren't open at all for the possibility of change. Most peoples' main argument against it deals with the Bible. Which then leads me to point out that in America, we have a concept called the SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE. There is a REASON that politics and religion do not mix. Because they don't mix well. Also, when did God become such an exclusive entity? "You guys get to go to Heaven, but because you others are gay and have 'sinned,' you're screwed. Have fun in Hell." Maybe it's just me, but I always pictured the God that I worship and pray to to be a little more inclusive person. God accepts close to everyone, I'm sure. Being gay is not a sin, just as much as being straight isn't a sin. Because I want the choice to have an abortion should I ever (hopefully not) have an unexpected pregnancy doesn't make me a sinner--I just want to keep my options open. I would rather abort a baby (at the beginning---not when the baby is its own person) if my circumstances were less than acceptable than bring it into a place that is less than ideal for a child. Arguments for adoption are frequently something I hear at this stage in my case. Which, I'm all for adoption, but do you honestly realize just HOW many children get put up for adoption or are in foster homes as it is? And many of the foster homes aren't adequate, so we run into problems there. Besides, I am not necessarily saying that I would ever get an abortion--I just want to be able to consider it an option. Plus, just because something is illegal doesn't mean it isn't going to happen. Look at all the illegal drugs out there. Just because they are considered illegal doesn't stop people from doing them. In fact, it adds to the thrill of it all. So if your whole goal in trying to make abortion illegal is so people won't seek them out, it won't stop them from seeking them out, it will just make the option more risky and dangerous--adding to the thrill.
With same-sex marriages, people's views are "Well, in the Bible, it clearly states that marriage is between a man and a woman." I have HUGE problems with the aforementioned statement. The bible was written HOW many years ago??? Times have changed in so many ways since then that it would take me YEARS to list them all. I just think it's sad that some people base their opinions on a book that is ridiculously old--when times have obviously changed. Some have suggested a 'same-sex union' that isn't marriage, but still receives most of the same rights that come with marriage. But here's the problem. It's SEPARATE but equal. Kind of like what whites did to blacks up until around 40 years ago, huh? I guess I thought, as a society, we were better than that.
Maybe I just have some more to learn. Ah well, such is life.
I just got done watching a marathon of VH1's 100 Greatest Songs of the 90s, though I have yet to see the episode where they show 81-100. I am pleasantly surprised to say that Nirvana's Smells Like Teen Spirit was number one. Though I was a kid during those years, that was my generation, and I must say I did know all but four songs on the countdown. And SLTS is one of my favorite songs by arguably one of the greatest bands to ever record an album.
I also got to see Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street earlier today, and I was quite impressed. I will definitely be pulling for this one when award-show time comes around. Sweeney Todd tells the story of Benjamim Barker, a barber who is married and has a daughter. Alan Rickman plays a judge that wants Barker's wife, so he sentences Barker to 15 years in prison. Barker comes back 15 years later as Sweeney Todd, who is hell-bent on revenge against the judge, who also has Barker's (or rather Todd's) daughter held captive. He cooks up a perfect plan--give the boys a shave and then slit their throats. Helena Bonham Carter is also amazing in it, playing Mrs. Lovett, the lady who is in love with Sweeney and helps him mastermind the plan. Basically, I would recommend this movie in a heartbeat to anyone, but I would leave the kids at home, because it is quite bloody. They do show the throat-slitting in detail, so if you have a weak stomach, this also might not be the best movie for you.
There are definitely a lot more movies I want to see during break: Alvin and the Chipmunks, Awake, Juno (though I don't think it comes out in wide release until January), and Atonement. Let's hope I get them all in!
So I just realized that I haven't posted in four days. It's finals week though, so that's my excuse. And, it's fitting, because today is the release of Harry Potter: Order of the Phoenix on DVD. What way to better celebrate than to have an entire blog dedicated to the wonderful world of Harry Potter? (Though I think I mention HP in just about all my blogs) First, I'll start off with a list of my favie characters, then I'll talk about the fifth and sixth movies (which are on my mind right now).
First, my top five favorite characters:
1) Draco Malfoy-- I am hopelessly in love with this guy. He became my favorite in the sixth book. It's not just because Tom Felton is cute, but I absolutely love how we thought he was nothing but an immature, close-minded moron, yet he turned out to be actually human. I think that honestly, he had the beliefs that muggle-borns weren't as good as purebloods hammered into him since his birth, and I doubt he had loving parents growing up. Narcissa might've tried, but with Lucius around that was probably almost impossible. And, if you think about it, he isn't evil. At the end of the sixth book, he doesn't kill Dumbledore, and he even lowers his wand. Then, in the seventh book, he doesn't identify Harry, Ron, and Hermione (in the chapter "Malfoy Manor"), and even instructs Crabbe not to curse them. So, though he didn't exactly redeem himself, he has proven that he isn't evil. That makes him redeemed in my book.
2) Fred and George Weasley-- Seriously, what's not to love about these two? They are beyond hilarious! Really, I think that's the only explanation I need about them.
3) Probably Ron, just because he also is quite hilarious, though not as funny as Fred and George!
4) Neville and Luna- Neville became my favorite when I read the fifth book, but Luna didn't make the list until I saw OotP in theaters. Evanna Lynch really portrayes her as quite likeable, whereas in the book she got on my nerves. And Neville is just the biggest sweetheart-- I just want to hug him!
5) Hagrid-- I had to include Hagrid in my top five! He's the one who introduced Harry into the wizarding world, and has such a kind and gentle heart, which is a complete contrast to every stereotype out there about giants.
Honestly though, I could continue this list for a very, very long time, because almost everyone in the HP series holds a dear place in my heart.
Anyway, onto the fifth and sixth movies. IMO, the fifth movie has been the best, so far. It's also been the one that has cut out the least (which is odd, considering it's the longest book). I am in love with David Yates as a director, am BEYOND happy that he's directing the sixth movie, and hope he gets to direct the seventh as well. He really recognized what was important and what could be cut out. The only two problems I had were very minor: they cut out the portrait in Grimmuld Place and they made it so Cho was the one who gave up the DA, rather than her friend. But, it has been the most accurate so far. I am definitely anticipating the sixth movie, but I sincerely hope that they focus more on Draco than they have been. He might not've been the most pivitol character so far, but they barely showed him in the 4th and 5th movies! But, I did see that they kept the scene in the 6th book where Draco and Harry have their little conversation on the Hogwarts Express. At least, they filmed it, so hopefully they use it. I don't think they'll be able to cut a lot of Draco scenes out in this movie because he plays such a major role-- the whole getting the Death Eaters into the school and virtually causing Dumbledore's death thing.
Can't wait for next year!
<georgeness>